Christine wrote:
No, I ranted on it yesterday. Quite a bit.
Though I did take out the graph where I linked George Pichette directly to the increase in hungry people and infant mortality.
and a very good rant you did on it, too. This is just so sinful and I have to completely agree with you. WHEN THE HE!! DID THESE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EVER WORRY ABOUT ACTING WITHIN THE LAW???
They thumb their noses at us all the time, "HA-HA catch us if you can. Take us to court." There is nothing in the law that says they must charge the same. It just isn't there.
I was, however, talking about the wording of the motion.
Can you actually read that and make sense of it?
Does it seem like whenever they do something particularly heinous they manage to word it in such a way that it is damn near impossible to figure out what they did? Just another sneaky way to keep people from knowing what is going on.