shiawasseecounty.net

Shiawassee County Forums
It is currently Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:29 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 9:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 7:32 pm
Cash on hand:
0.00

Posts: 48
Location: Shiawassee County
Personally I would at this point think the dogs are better off on the streets. Our Animal Control stinks, as does the upper management who doesn't know squat about running a shelter and could care less. they would rather kill off the dogs and cats( and pay to do so) rather than try to get them adopted out by having reasonable hours or post them on websites and give them time to adopt if there is space.

The licensing fees, well, sorry but all of them were recommended by the State Veterinarian at the time at one of the meetings and we as a county are still not as high (for individual dogs) as some places. We also called animal controls in areas with the same size populous to get an idea of what license fees could go to. $5 and $10 is just ridiculous. The plan was to fix the problem building (regardless of whether or not it had cats in it) and some adoption programs. I think it was 2005 that we were at a 70% kill rate for our shelter.

If the legislation says that low an amount for kennel fees then we need to talk to state government about fixing it as well. I'm personally sick of people breeding dogs for money only to sock it to us rescues who are stuck fishing them out of shelters and homing them again because we feel bad for those dying in shelters. Good breeders care about the genetics of what they are breeding, good breeders have puppies placed before even breeding, they do application processes and home visits to see WHERE their dogs will be living because they care about the pups, they also do not give full registration on the papers so that anyone can breed to anything and create all the damn mutts that are taxing our overflowing shelter systems. they also are the first contact to take their dog back if it doesn't work out with the purchaser. is this alot to expect? No. Good breeders do not make money on their litters if they are doing it correctly, they are doing it for betterment of the breed-getting the genetic testing and shots and everything else that they should.

As far as the shelter, I say close it and be done. Then our board can't con people into thinking that they might actually be supporting an animal control. Then the animals won't be sick and dying because they were exposed to a bad environment, the sheriff can spend more time doing whatever it is that he does. You all going to elect him to do it for 4 more years?

I'm sure Kay, that you probably take good care of your kennel, but the harsh reality is that many do not. I have seen it over and over and it never seems to end. So instead of people refusing to fix their animals and going from 6 to 18 to 25 and having nowhere for these pets, it should be cheaper to fix their pets and pay a much lower fee. We don't need uneducated backyard breeders littering everywhere.

If I had my way anyone advertising litters in the paper would be checked for licenses and tags as well-and ticketed if they aren't licensed.

Bottom line is that there is a pet overpopulation problem, tickets don't get written enough, the laws that we have aren't enforced, and the shelter is a piece of crap with a bad ventilation system.

It ticks me off because not only do I get hit for licensing, taxes- I have to pay to pull and rehome the animals as well. Why? Because I CARE TOO MUCH.

Cindy


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 1:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 1:49 am
Cash on hand:
0.00

Posts: 256
Location: Corunna
Personally I would at this point think the dogs are better off on the streets.

The dogs don't know any better. They aren't toilet trained. Maybe the owners are the ones who should be kept off of the streets.


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 7:45 pm 
Offline
I just heard that the Shiawassee Animal Control Officer does not go into the townships, cities or villages that have their own "animal control" ordinance.

Sorry, I can't help myself. That is just about the funniest thing I ever heard.
:laughing5: :toothy7: :blob2: :toothy10: :happy2: :toothy10: :blob2: :toothy7: :laughing5:
:shock: :lol: :roll: :laughing8: :laughing7: :laughing6: :shock: :laughing5: :laughing4: :laughing5: :laughing3: :laughing2: :laughing1: :laughing9: :toothy7: :toothy10: :toothy8: :lol: :wink:
:laughing5: :toothy7: :blob2: :toothy10: :happy2: :toothy10: :blob2: :toothy7: :laughing5:

kaylor wrote:
http://ci.owosso.mi.us/ReferenceDesk/CityCode/Chapter5-Animals.pdf

Section 5-32 seems to cover it.

Just have to get them to enforce

Just too funny, can't help myself.

this is just another illegal ordinance! Too funny!

I put it on my blog for all to see

http://shiacac.blogspot.com/2007/01/41- ... imals.html


and that isn't even the funniest part...........


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 5:16 pm 
Offline
There are 5 cities in Shiawassee County: Corunna, Durand, Laingsburg, Owosso and Perry with a total population of about 26,000. Four of those have websites with dog ordinances quite similar to those of the city of Owosso. Perry’s ordinance does mention dog licenses, the others do not.

There are 6 Villages In Shiawassee County: Bancroft, Byron, Lennon (partially), Morrice, New Lothrup, and Vernon with a total population of about 4000. I don’t know if they have a dog ordinance or not. The three who have websites do not have a dog ordinance on it.

So far I have only identified one township with a website and also has a dog ordinance on it..

The Shiawassee County Animal Control does not go into any of these. Their own police take care of any complaints.

That is right around 34,000 people in a county with a population of around 72,000, roughly 47% of the population of Shiawassee County that is not being covered by the Shiawassee Animal Control department. Yet, all the money collected for dog licenses goes into the county general fund with 2007 animal control estimated revenues of $158,000, expenses $153,000.

My my my…………that is interesting.

How much do you suppose it costs the county to administer the Dog Law of 1919 in this township and these cities and villages? $5 per dog? $10? $20? $30

I just don’t see it costing the county much at all. If a person buys a dog license from a veterinarian, the county pays the vet $3.00 per license. So, I guess the county could claim that those licenses cost them $3.

You can also mail in for your license, then the county wouldn’t have to pay that $3.

The county also has to buy the license from the state. That can’t be much. $1.00 per license? The book the licenses are recorded in, I think is provided.

Doesn’t amount to much, does it? The Dog Law of 1919 and the Shiawassee County Animal Control Ordinance both allow the county to set the license fee at a level sufficient to cover the cost of administering the Dog Law of 1919.

I think they are way overcharging for dog licenses already, But this township, city and village thing is just way beyond even my idea of an overcharge! It is more like fraud. I think if I lived in this township, or a city or village I just wouldn’t buy a dog license.

That would cost the county nothing.


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 1:49 am
Cash on hand:
0.00

Posts: 256
Location: Corunna
I agree that the county is overcharging. When I lived in Cadillac a few years ago licenses there were $5 when they were $10 here. Weren't licenses $15 here just a few years ago?? I seem to remember being appalled.

Even though licenses may be $10 for spayed/neutered animals now, I would rather pay that than get caught without one and pay the fine. Much cheaper!


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 11:33 pm 
Offline
Jodi wrote:
I agree that the county is overcharging. When I lived in Cadillac a few years ago licenses there were $5 when they were $10 here. Weren't licenses $15 here just a few years ago?? I seem to remember being appalled.

Even though licenses may be $10 for spayed/neutered animals now, I would rather pay that than get caught without one and pay the fine. Much cheaper!


I know............its a shame it is just so much easier to let these outlaws illegally run/ruin our lives than it is to try and make them obey the law.


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Foul, ferocious, fermenting Felines!
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 1:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:04 pm
Cash on hand:
0.00

Bank:
83.00

Posts: 2370
Location: Central Michigan
kaylor wrote:
Jodi wrote:
I agree that the county is overcharging. When I lived in Cadillac a few years ago licenses there were $5 when they were $10 here. Weren't licenses $15 here just a few years ago?? I seem to remember being appalled.

Even though licenses may be $10 for spayed/neutered animals now, I would rather pay that than get caught without one and pay the fine. Much cheaper!


I know............its a shame it is just so much easier to let these outlaws illegally run/ruin our lives than it is to try and make them obey the law.


Did you mean this for another topic?????? Anyway, what the county should be doing is rounding up all the Feral Cats in the county and sending them to the Gas Chamber!! p.s. WE found all the Nazi blueprints for Gas Chambers from 1940!!!!
:blob: :blob2: :blob3: :blob5: :blob6: :blob7: :blob8: :hello2:

_________________
Never be too busy to meet someone new!
(Life's little instruction book.)


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Foul, ferocious, fermenting Felines!
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 3:36 pm 
Offline
Fritz wrote:
kaylor wrote:
I know............its a shame it is just so much easier to let these outlaws illegally run/ruin our lives than it is to try and make them obey the law.

Did you mean this for another topic??????
This certainly seems to fit a myriad of other topics.
Anyway, what the county should be doing is rounding up all the Feral Cats in the county and sending them to the Gas Chamber!!
Naw, can't agree with you on that. You know what to do.
Don't expect the county to do it for you. (p.s. they ain't gonna.)

p.s. WE found all the Nazi blueprints for Gas Chambers from 1940!!!!
Not a good thing to advertise. The county already has one.
What ya gonna do with 'em after you run out of cats (in about a week)?

:blob: :blob2: :blob3: :blob5: :blob6: :blob7: :blob8: :hello2:

YUP.....it's gotta be the weather. Is that yer second favorite emoticon?
Ya missed one..... :blob4:

:sign7: Hey, maybe you could organize a cat roundup. Just an idea.


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Feline Round up!
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:04 pm
Cash on hand:
0.00

Bank:
83.00

Posts: 2370
Location: Central Michigan
kaylor wrote:
:blob4: :sign7: Hey, maybe you could organize a cat roundup. Just an idea.


True Story: Leelanau County (the little finger of Michigan) circa 1975 +/-

So many dogs running around the County in packs and harassing children and others, they decided to have a "Puppy Shoot" (my words) They (County Sheriff) had articles in newspapers for weeks then one weekend he deputized a bunch of the local hunters or anyone that had a shotgun and a pickup truck to ride around and shoot any loose dogs they found running free. That must've been quite a sight, pickup trucks loaded with blaze orange coated men bristling with shotguns all over the county. I don't know if any of them shot each other or not. :roll:
I'll admit that is a little drastic but one has to ask how did the problem get that bad? My mother lived in Leelanau Co. at the time and the neighbor's dogs would come right up on her porch growling and barking at her when she tried to go out. The neighbors attitude? "OH! they wouldn't hurt a fly!"
Well, maybe I am a sissy but a 75 lb. dog, tail up, hair raised on his back, snarling and circling around behind me is a threat and I am not going to "wait and see" if he is going to bite me.
:twisted: [smilie=armata_pdt_42.gif] [smilie=armata_pdt_41.gif]

_________________
Never be too busy to meet someone new!
(Life's little instruction book.)


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 7:44 pm
Cash on hand:
0.00

Posts: 106
Location: Dutchtown
Hey Fritz I remember that!

A friend and former boss of mine had a place up there in the woods, rather primitive w/out house and hand pump in the sink for water :lol:

When you went to the toilet (at night especially) you took the shotgun with you as the roaming packs of dogs might decide you didn't need to get back in the house.

I don't know if it's still a problem, but I can't imagine it's changed a whole lot.

Barry

_________________
purveyor of crooked facts


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Feline Round up!
PostPosted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:57 pm 
Offline
Fritz wrote:
True Story: Leelanau County (the little finger of Michigan) circa 1975 +/-
So many dogs running around the County in packs and harassing children and others, they decided to have a "Puppy Shoot" (my words) ......

It has only been a few years since they had a similar problem in Flint with packs of stray dogs. They 'rounded' them up somehow, don't recall much publicity about the roundup part. Cats are not as likely to attack humans, won't get as much enthusiasn for a cat roundup, or "kitty shoot". Except the hunters have told me the cats really jump and scream when you shoot them. They seem to find that amusing.
:puke: :pukeright: :pukeleft:


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:39 am 
Offline
Can't believe so many hits on this thread. If you are coming in via Christine's website where she calls this a Discussion on the various dog laws in Shiawassee

There is way more discussion on my blog at http://shiacac.blogspot.com/ that goes into more (way more) detail on Shiawassee County's Animal Control Ordinance. Also includes some about the cities.

There is also a link to "Michigan Dog Owners Assn" that talks more about state law and other counties.


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:50 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:17 am
Cash on hand:
0.00

Posts: 40
Not everyone is bad with the dog doo problem. I live in downtown Owosso and see the same woman almost every morning before I leave for work walking her dog. This is in the area where my car is parked and I have never see any poo or stepped in any for that matter. So everyone isn't that bad. I'm saying this just to thank the responsible dog owners who live downtown and follow the rules. Thank you.


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 4:48 pm 
Offline
Harmonic wrote:
rolo wrote:
Harmonic says: The workers are being taken advantage of and paid far less than workers in the USA.

I have friends from India who have family there that are employed by "our" IT companies. Trust me. They ARE NOT being taken advantage of. They may be paid less than North American workers BUT they are fabulously wealthy with the pay level they are contracted at and very very happy with their income and working conditions. The level of pay and the working conditions may be "below" our standards but it is a HUGE improvement in their lives.



Wages in sweatshops are clearly below nominal wage rates in other countries. For example, in 2003, Honduran factory workers were paid $0.15 to make a Sean John-brand t-shirt that cost its U.S. bulk importer $3.65 and sells at retail for $40.00 Critics point out the irony that sweatshop workers don't earn enough money to buy the products that they make, even though such items are often commonplace goods such as t-shirts, shoes, and toys. However, defenders of such practices respond that critics of sweatshops are comparing wages paid in one country to prices set in another. Although the wages paid to workers in Hounduras would hardly be enough to live in the United States, it could very well be enough to live in Hounduras, where prices are much lower. For example, the $0.15 that a Honduran worker might be paid to produce a designer-brand shirt, is comparable, in terms of purchasing power, to $3.00 in the United States.
My conclusion would be the price of land, homes and other items here in the U.S. will have to go down and we will have to have our own sweatshops once again. Even if the shops are not legal we will have workers with no jobs who will take underground jobs for cash under the table. Medical care will be nonexistent since no one will be able to pay the bill.


Harmonic wiped out all of his posts on this thread............

but he missed this one..........


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 22, 2007 1:03 pm 
Offline
I still haven't figured why this gets so many hits................?


Top | Print view this post
  Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alleymad, fred beyers, Google Adsense [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group